Legal Opinion
Roxborough Apartment Corp. v. Becker
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided February 17, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rolando T. Acosta, J.
In this holdover proceeding, petitioner landlord seeks a judg*504ment of possession of respondent’s rent-stabilized apartment because, according to petitioner, respondent has not occupied the apartment as his primary residence.
In a preanswer motion, respondent tenant moves for an order dismissing the petition on the ground that the landlord’s acceptance and retention of three months’ rent after the tenancy was purportedly terminated and before the commencement of the holdover proceeding vitiated the notice of nonrenewal and notice of termination, thus…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho LamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- 205 East 78th Street Associates v. CassidyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Guy v. FurmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956
- Stribula v. WienAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
- Associated Realties v. BrownCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Business Machines Corp. v. Joseph Stevens & Co., L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Roxborough Apartment Corp. v. BeckerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
- 170 East 77th 1 LLC v. BerensonNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- 591 Realty LLC v. CuranajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Mutual Housing of Tompkins County, Inc. v. HawesIthaca City Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.