Legal Opinion

Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho Lam

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1980PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

*787The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Upon a breach by the tenant of one of the lease provisions, petitioner landlord was entitled to serve the tenant with a "Notice of Intention to Terminate Occupancy”; and, under the terms of the lease, the tenancy would terminate automatically after service of such notice unless the tenant acted within 10 .days to cure the alleged breach. Here, so far as is material to the issue in this appeal, the notice served upon respondent tenant alleged only that a "partition” had been erected on the…

2Cited by80 opinions

  1. Domen Holding Co. v. AranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. WILJEFF, LLC v. UNITED REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Filmtrucks, Inc. v. Express Industries & Terminal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Garland v. Titan West AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API