Legal Opinion
Mirto v. Amalgamated Retail Insurance Fund
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 11, 1995No. 93 Civ. 7227 (DAB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1387 OPINION AND ORDER
BATTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph R. Mirto, D.C.P.C., brings this action against defendant Amalgamated Retail Insurance Fund to recover benefits under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). The defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For reasons more fully explained below, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The Amalgamated Retail Insurance Fund (“the Fund”) is a multi-employer trust fund created pursuant to an Agreement and Declaration of Trust. The purpose of the Fund is to provide…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- A.R. Peter Lafond v. General Physics Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E.R. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Semmler v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997