Legal Opinion

Glasrud v. City of Laramie

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1997No. 96-135PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Matthew Glasrud’s (Glasrud) prosecution and conviction in municipal court for driving under the influence followed the administrative suspension of Glasrud’s driver’s license, eliciting double jeopardy concerns. In response to Glasrud’s appeal from his proseeu tion and conviction, the district court presents certified questions pursuant to Wyoming Rule of Appellate Procedure 11. We hold Wyoming’s implied consent laws, providing for suspension of a driver’s license for driving while under the influence, do not constitute “punishment” for purposes of double jeopardy.

ISSUE

Faced…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wyoming Department of Transportation v. HaglundWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BurnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Regan v. State ex rel. Wyoming Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Mecikalski v. Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal InvestigationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API