Legal Opinion

Regan v. State ex rel. Wyoming Department of Transportation

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2012No. Nos. S-12-0074, S-12-0075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[T1] This opinion encompasses two separate appeals from two separate appellants, but both appeals challenge the implied consent advisement as affected by the same Laramie ordinance. While the appeals have not been consolidated, we join them for the purposes of opinion.

[T2] Kyle Regan and Joseph Parsons, in separate incidents, were both arrested for driving while under the influence (DWUI). Following their arrests, each appellant consented to chemical testing. Regan's test showed that he had a 0.26 percent blood alcohol concentration, and Parsons' test showed that he had a 0.16…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kenyon v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Workers' Compensation Claim of Moss v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Mogard v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re KaczmarekWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kara Walters v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Ricky D. Johnson v. State of Wyoming ex rel., Wyoming Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Kara Walters v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API