In Re JUDE
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals by leave granted the order of the circuit court affirming the decision of a board of review made pursuant to the Drain Code of 1956 (Drain Code), MCL 280.1 et seq.) MSA 11.1001 et seq., decreasing the amounts that defendant landowners must pay in connection with a drain expansion project and increasing plaintiff’s assessment by the same amount. We reverse and remand.
i
This case arises out of a drain expansion project, known as “Austin Drain No. 1, Extension Drain” (Austin Drain), supervised by defendant Jackson County Drain Commissioner Geoffrey Snyder. Plaintiff and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wilkins v. GagliardiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cape v. Howell Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morrison v. City of East LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hall v. HansonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bertrand v. City of MacKinac IslandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- County of Ingham v. Mi County Road Commission Self-Insurance PoolMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Hall v. HansonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.