Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hanson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2003No. Docket Nos. 222800, 222803PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court, having concluded as a matter of law that this was a proper action to quiet title, entered a judgment dividing a piece of disputed property. None of the original plaintiffs participates in this appeal. We reverse and remand.

I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

These consolidated appeals arise from a property dispute involving a stretch of land located in Grayling Township, Crawford County. This piece of property is called “Northerly Boulevard,” and at some times simply “Boulevard” or “boulevard.” This land, which leads to Lake Margrethe, was marked as a “boulevard” on a 1902…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BeasleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Kraus v. MICH. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. McGoldrick v. Holiday Amusements, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Christiansen v Gerrish TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re JUDEMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Beach v. Lima TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Martin v. BeldeanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Beach v. Lima TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Hall v. HansonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API