Legal Opinion

Austin v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1964No. [No. 240, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from an order by Judge Cullen declaring that the appellee was not obligated to make payment on any judgment had against Millard Murray, the driver of a car owned by John Robinson, Jr. The appellants were injured in a collision between this car and their own on September 13, 1959. The order also absolved National Indemnity Company from making payments for either Murray or Robinson. The court’s first ruling was based on a finding that the appellants had not exhausted their remedy against Robinson, and that this relieved the Fund from liability.

The facts are quite complicated and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  2. Wormack v. HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McConnaughyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Gray v. TiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Honeywell v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Selimo v. HartshornNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Ballantine v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API