Legal Opinion
Selimo v. Hartshorn
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 1, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
99 N.J. Super. 146 (1968)
238 A.2d 718
SAMUEL SELIMO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
OTIS HARTSHORN, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided February 1, 1968.
Mr. Daniel E. Isles for plaintiff (Messrs. Querques & Isles, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph P. Dallanegra, Jr. for defendant (Messrs. Dallanegra & Dallanegra, attorneys).
LARNER, J.S.C.
The issue involved herein arises upon plaintiff's application for payment of a judgment by the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Fund) which he obtained against defendant after a contested jury trial. The case was tried before this court and resulted in a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. GillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Kyle v. Green Acres at Verona, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Dixon v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Feliciano v. OglesbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Norman v. Selective Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Farnham v. StreleckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968