Legal Opinion
Honeywell v. Roberson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 13, 1965No. [No. 299, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.
On September 27, 1962, the appellees, Frank F. Roberson and Vera Mae, his wife, filed suit against the appellant, George A. Honeywell, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to recover damages suffered as the result of an automobile accident which occurred on July 3, 1962. On October 1, 1962, Mrs. Roberson filed with the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board a notice of intention to make a claim against the Fund. (The record does not show that Mr. Roberson filed such a notice but the point is not raised on this appeal.) Judgments were entered in the tort action in favor of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wormack v. HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Mundey v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. RossDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Gilbert v. Unsatisfied Claim, Etc., Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Austin v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
3Cited by5 opinions
- McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Ballantine v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Maddox v. ShanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Parks v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989