Legal Opinion

Hoboken Trust Co. v. Norton

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 1, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On bill, &c. On petition, &c. On application for an order that respondent forthwith, pay over moneys collected as solicitor.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

The bill in this case is one of interpleader and prayed for leave to pay into court a certain fund concerning which the defendants disputed ownership, and to require them to litigate their respective claims between themselves.. On June 6th, 1918, a decree was made that the bill of interpleader was properly brought and ordering the payment into court of the. fund held by the complainant, which amounted to $7,038. Thereafter such proceedings were had in the cause that on January 2d, 1919, a decree was made by consent endorsed thereon by Leon Abbett, solicitor for defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Brackett v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
  3. Larey v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Andrews v. . TyngNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Chatfield v. SimonsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Conover v. West Jersey Mortgage Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. Erickson v. FooteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Merewood, Inc. v. DenshawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  5. Ertag v. Cavallo Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API