Legal Opinion

Ertag v. Cavallo Construction Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 29, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the passing of the receiver's account, application was made for counsel fee for the solicitor of the complainant. Certain facts in connection with this cause indicating unprofessional conduct on the part of the solicitors having been previously brought to the court's attention, decision was reserved pending examination and report by a special master to whom the matter was referred. His report, on file, discloses the following astounding state of facts:

The solicitors of the complainant and the defendant composed the law firm of Ehrenkranz Kay. The defendant company was incorporated in their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoboken Trust Co. v. NortonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morris v. GlaserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  2. Flemington National Bk. and Tr. Co. v. SindlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API