Legal Opinion
Erickson v. Foote
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
On January 26th, 1926, counsel retained and employed by the defendant Foote for that purpose, prepared an application for a writ of mandamus against the present plaintiffs, to compel them, as members of the board of assessors of the town of Branford, to include in the assessment list certain property at its true and actual value, and presented the same to the State’s Attorney for New Haven County, who approved and signed the application. The action was then proceeded with and finally resulted in judgment for the then plaintiff, which was affirmed by this court. State v. Erickson, 104 Conn.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Cummings Ex Rel. Eliott v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Barton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- New Haven Savings Bank v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Belford v. Breck (In Re Medical Cost Management, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Shaker, Admx. v. ShakerConnecticut Superior Court · 1943