Legal Opinion
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Continental Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 2005No. H026867PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
In this insurance coverage matter, Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed) seeks coverage under numerous policies for pollution-related liability totaling hundreds of millions of dollars. (See Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior Court (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1440, 1444—1445 [75 Cal.Rptr.2d 54] {Travelers).) After 10 years of litigation, the trial court entered judgment for the insurers and Lockheed has appealed.
Lockheed raises five issues on appeal. The first three issues involve interpretation of certain comprehensive general liability (CGL) policies issued by Harbor…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State of California v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Qualcomm, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot. v. Howell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Alexander v. Exxon MobilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.