Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Cober

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 2006No. C030889CV; A126181PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict for defendant in this action for medical malpractice. Although plaintiff makes multiple assignments of error, we write only to address her argument that the trial court erred in failing to submit to the jury for use in its deliberations a photograph that the court had admitted into evidence for demonstrative purposes. We affirm.

Plaintiff was afflicted with carpal tunnel syndrome in both hands. Defendant, a physician, performed an endoscopic carpal tunnel release on plaintiffs left hand. That surgery was successful. Defendant later performed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. HeintzOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Stupek v. Wyle Laboratories Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PangbornNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. StullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Fred Meyer Stores v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Fred Meyer Stores v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Fred Meyer Stores v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API