Legal Opinion
Goe v. City of Mexico
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 26, 2001No. ED 79327PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs, Danny G. Goe and Edna Goe, appeal from the dismissal of their action for damages against defendant, City of Mexico, Missouri (hereinafter City), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We reverse and remand.
Plaintiffs brought an action against City, titling their action “PETITION FOR DAMAGES (Inverse Condemnation).” In their petition, they alleged the following: that they were the owners of a mobile home located at 511 Eastholm in City; that City removed the mobile home without their permission and without due…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McIntosh v. FoulkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Memco, Inc. v. ChronisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Collins v. SwopeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Boone County v. County Employees' Retirement FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ampleman v. SchweissMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Envirotech, Inc. v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Thomas v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- ADP Dealer Services Group v. Carroll Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Williams v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Petti v. Goodwin-RafteryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.