State Ex Rel. Petti v. Goodwin-Raftery
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge.
Jerome A. Petti and Stanley F. Eber-sohl (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their petition for writ of mandamus and declaratory judgment against Karen Goodwin-Raftery, the City Clerk for the City of Florissant, (“City Clerk”) and the City of Florissant (“Florissant”) (collectively referred to as “Defendants”). Because Plaintiffs’ petition failed to invoke principles of substantive law that, if proved, would entitle them to mandamus and declaratory relief, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ petition.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Chassaing v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Powers v. DonohueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Dodson v. City of WentzvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Trotter v. CirtinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crow v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Eisel v. Midwest BankCentreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Lemay Fire Protection District v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Chastain v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Joan Bray v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.