Stewart-Decatur Security Systems, Inc. v. Von Weise Gear Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WEBSTER, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal we consider whether, in a contract for the sale of goods, an approved prototype may displace an inconsistent specification in a written purchase order.
Appellant Stewart-Decatur Security Systems, Inc., manufactures jail doors for use in penal institutions. A small electric gear motor is employed to open and close the doors automatically. Appellee von Weise Gear Co. builds gears and fractional horsepower gear motors.
In early 1970, Stewart-Decatur placed an order with von Weise for a prototype of a gear motor to replace a gear motor then being supplied by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- T. C. V'soske, S. T. V'soske, K. A. V'soske, George A. Spater and V'soske Shops, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick and E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Wisconsin Marine & Fire Insurance Co. Bank v. WilkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- St. Joseph Union Depot Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Porterfield v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Amf, Incorporated v. McDonald CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- St. Charles Cable TV, Inc. v. Eagle Comtronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Falcon Tankers, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
- Arb (American Research Bureau), Inc. v. E-Systems, Inc., Arb (American Research Bureau), Inc. v. E-Systems, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.