Legal Opinion
St. Charles Cable TV, Inc. v. Eagle Comtronics, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1988No. 83 Civ. 7126 (LFM)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, St. Charles Cable TV, Inc. (“SCC”), the buyer, brings this action against the seller, defendant Eagle Com-tronics, Inc. (“Eagle”), for damages for breach of warranty, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation by Eagle in the sale of allegedly defective descramblers to SCC. Alexandria Realty Corp., Energistics, Inc., Delta Telecommunications, and Robert Broz (collectively “the licensees”) join SCC’s action as nominal coplaintiffs whose claims must stand or fall with SCC’s. Eagle asserts counterclaims against SCC and its affiliate, Cable Holdings, Inc.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- George Lambert, D/B/A Rainbow Fruit v. Sam Kysar and Joan Kysar, D/B/A Lewis River Tree FarmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Bayway Refining Company, Tosco Corporation, Counter v. Oxygenated Marketing and Trading A.G., CounterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Comark Merchandising, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Highland Group, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- In re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- C9 Ventures v. SVC-West, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.