Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Martino
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 2, 2003No. 98 CV 3446(MP)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) has moved for summary judgment against defendants Carol Martino (“Martino”), CMA Noel Ltd. (“CMA”), Gerard Haryman (“Haryman”), and JTM Limited (“JTM”). 1 Defendant Martino, a former stock broker, is a recidivist securities law violator and convicted felon (for related tax evasion). This civil enforcement action concerns Marti-no’s latest securities law violations. The Commission charges Martino with (1) flagrantly and repeatedly violating a 1992 Commission order…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. KramerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tecumseh Holdings Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CKB168 Holdings, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Togut v. RBC Dain Correspondent Services (In Re S.W. Bach & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.