Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kramer
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided April 1, 2011No. 6:09-cv-00455PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.
The Commission sues (Doc. 1) to permanently enjoin the defendant Kenneth R. Kramer from violating the broker registration requirement under Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78o (“Section 15(a)”). The Commission also seeks a penny stock bar, disgorgement, pre-judgment interest, and a civil penalty. A bench trial, during which the Commission presented evidence of alleged broker conduct, commenced on January 18, 2011, and ended on January 27, 2011. Kramer raised several objections pertaining to both the admissibility and the sufficiency of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MerkinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Ussec v. Hui FengCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Tempay, Inc. v. Biltres Staffing of Tampa Bay, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Honig v. KornfeldDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.