Legal Opinion

E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. International

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 24, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This is the decision on defendant’s (Resources) objection to plaintiff’s application to amend its complaint.

Plaintiff’s original complaint sought to rescind an alleged fraudulent conveyance by the defendant Resources. Plaintiff’s then status was that of an incipient judgment creditor on the basis of an action in the Delaware U.S. District Court. 114 F.Supp. 843. An unsuccessful attack was made on the original process in this action. See E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corporation International, 33 Del.Ch. 587, 98 A.2d 506.

*510Thereafter a money judgment was entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Copeland Motor Co. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. InternationalDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  3. E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. InternationalCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  4. Naamloze Vennootschap Suikerfabriek "Wono-aseh" v. Chase Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  5. Rogers v. Delaware Power & Light Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Itek Corporation v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1969
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. PappadioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  3. Mayer v. AdamsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
  4. Rollins International, Inc. v. International Hydronics Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1972
  5. EM Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. Int.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API