Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Adams

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 26, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Marvel, Vice Chancellor:

This action is admittedly one to enforce a secondary right, having been brought by a shareholder because Phillips Petroleum Company, a corporation in which plaintiff claims to have owned stock since in or about the year 1943, allegedly “* * * refuses to enforce rights which may properly be asserted by it.” Accordingly all the requirements of Chancery Rule 23(b) Del.C. Ann. including the part pertaining to prior corrective efforts within the corporate body must be observed by plaintiff. See opinion in this case reported in 36 Del.Ch. 466, 133 A.2d 138.

The appearing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Escoett v. Aldecress Country ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. InternationalCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mayer v. AdamsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API