Legal Opinion
Itek Corporation v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided September 3, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOREY, Judge.
This is an action for breach of an alleged agreement for the sale of corporate assets. Defendant, Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc., who filed its answer on May 10, 1965, now seeks leave to amend its answer, including as an additional defense an allegation that the alleged contract violated Federal antitrust laws, and was thus unenforceable. Plaintiff opposes defendant’s amendment on the grounds that the defense raised is not legally sufficient, that its assertion is untimely, that it will prejudice plaintiff and complicate the trial of the case.
There are two issues in this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Bellanca Corporation v. BellancaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dunfee v. Blue Rock Van & Storage, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1970
- Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1984
- Gott v. Newark Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1970
- Gulko v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1997
- Collins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.