E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. International
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
This is the decision on the motion of one defendant to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and on the motions of both defendants to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Plaintiff is a Maryland corporation. Defendant, Resources Corporation International (hereafter called “Resources”), is a Delaware corporation while defendant, Vancouver Plywood Company (hereafter called “Vancouver”), is a Washington corporation.
In view of the nature of the motions it becomes important to narrate the material allegations of the complaint. Those allegations show…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wightman v. San Francisco Bay Toll-Bridge Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Wightman v. San Francisco Bay Toll-BridgeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- United States v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1941
- Blumenthal v. BlumenthalCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
- Blumenthal v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sonne v. SacksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Getty Refining & Marketing Co. v. Park Oil, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
- Park Oil, Inc. v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- John Julian Construction Co. v. Monarch Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Widder v. LeedsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.