Legal Opinion

E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. International

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 16, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This is the decision on the motion of one defendant to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and on the motions of both defendants to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Plaintiff is a Maryland corporation. Defendant, Resources Corporation International (hereafter called “Resources”), is a Delaware corporation while defendant, Vancouver Plywood Company (hereafter called “Vancouver”), is a Washington corporation.

In view of the nature of the motions it becomes important to narrate the material allegations of the complaint. Those allegations show…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wightman v. San Francisco Bay Toll-Bridge Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  2. Wightman v. San Francisco Bay Toll-BridgeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  3. United States v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1941
  4. Blumenthal v. BlumenthalCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  5. Blumenthal v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sonne v. SacksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Getty Refining & Marketing Co. v. Park Oil, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  3. Park Oil, Inc. v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  4. John Julian Construction Co. v. Monarch Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Widder v. LeedsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API