Legal Opinion
Ulmer v. O'MALLEY
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1981No. 51472PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
Defendant Jack O’Malley, Jr., appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss this paternity action for lack of personal jurisdiction. The motion came before the district court on the following stipulated facts. In November 1979, plaintiff Kimberly Anne Ulmer moved from South Dakota to Minnesota. Shortly after her arrival she contacted Lutheran Social Service and informed a social worker that she was pregnant and planned to put the baby up for adoption. She named defendant as the child’s father and stated that she had engaged in sexual relations with him in March of 1979…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Howells v. McKibbenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sherburne County Social Sevices Ex Rel. Pouliot v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. HartlingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- NFD, INC. v. Stratford Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Now Foods Corp. v. Madison Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.