Now Foods Corp. v. Madison Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*365OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This appeal is from denial of a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Appellant Madison Equipment Company, Inc. argues that any exercise of personal jurisdiction over it would violate the due process clause. Respondent Now Foods, Inc. contends that the trial court’s assertion of jurisdiction does not violate fairness or substantial justice. Because sufficient minimum contacts do not exist between Madison and Minnesota, we reverse with directions to dismiss the complaint.
FACTS
Madison is engaged in the business of purchasing and selling used food packaging and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stanek v. A.P.I., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- S.B. Schmidt Paper Co. v. a to Z Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- NFD, INC. v. Stratford Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Olmsted County v. Trailer Equipment Warehouses, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Now Foods Corp. v. Madison Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986