Legal Opinion

Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 1987No. C2-87-931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

After her marital dissolution in Montana, Ila Ferguson relocated to Minnesota with the parties’ children and moved the Minnesota court for child support modification without using the procedures of the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA). The trial court dismissed her motion for lack of personal jurisdiction over the Montana obligor, and she appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

The marriage of appellant Ila Ferguson and respondent J. Paul Ferguson was dissolved in Montana in 1980. Ila Ferguson was granted custody of the four children, Rory, Luke, Timothy and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Kumar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Howells v. McKibbenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Ulmer v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pries v. WattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Carpenter v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Marriage of Scott v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Marriage of Impola v. ImpolaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API