Legal Opinion
Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 27, 1976No. 45527PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a pretrial judgment dismissing their action for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants. Jurisdiction had been asserted and service of process made pursuant to the “transacts any business” provision of our long-arm statute, Minn. St. 543.19, subd. 1(b).
Plaintiffs include a joint venture composed of Hardrives, Inc., a Minnesota corporation engaged in asphalt paving, and A. J. Ostreng, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation engaged in supplying paving materials, and Hardrives, Inc., acting individually. Defendants are the city of LaCrosse, a Wisconsin…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Dent-Air, Inc. v. Beech Mountain Air Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Valspar Corp. v. Lukken Color Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Vikse v. FlabySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Larson v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.