Legal Opinion
Sandford v. Town of Wolfeboro
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 13, 1999No. 96-588PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The plaintiff, Joseph W. Sandford, Jr., appeals the Superior. Court’s (Abramson, J.) ruling that defendant Town of Wolfeboro (town) had acquired a prescriptive easement to flow Sandford’s lakeside property above 528 feet mean sea level (M.S.L.). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and. remand.
*483I
Because this case was decided by summary judgment, we recite the undisputed facts supported by sufficient documentation in accordance with RSA 491:8-a, and only those allegations necessary to illustrate the conflict before us. Sandford owns property on the shore of Lake Wentworth in Wolfeboro. The level…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Del Norte, Inc. v. ProvencherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Tzimas v. Coiffures ex rel. MichaelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Cote v. EldeenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Ellison v. FellowsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- VanDeMark v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Berry v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Robert Jesurum v. WBTSCC Limited Partnership & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Sandford v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Lake v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.