Legal Opinion
Sandford v. Town of Wolfeboro
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 4, 2005No. 2004-036PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The plaintiff, Joseph W. Sandford, Jr., appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Fauver, J.) determining the scope of an easement to flow his land; the defendant, the Town of Wolfeboro (town), owns the easement. This case returns to us after remand to the trial court. See Sandford v. Town of Wolfeboro, 143 N.H. 481 (1999). We affirm.
The background of this case was initially set forth in Sandford and is only briefly restated here. The plaintiff owns property on the shore of Lake Wentworth in Wolfeboro. The water level of the lake is controlled by dam #258.01, which has had a height of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cote v. EldeenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Sandford v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Cataldo v. GrapponeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Bucklin v. TruellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1873
- Winnipiseogee Lake Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yoder v. Town of MiddletonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Worrall v. FNMA and NationstarDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Attard v. Benoit et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
- Lintner, et al. V. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Carey v. EglodyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.