Legal Opinion

Lane v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1935No. 25454PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Parties to (his appeal appear in the same order as in the court below, that is to say, Lora Lane, plaintiff below, is plaintiff in error here, and Alice M. O'Brien et al., defendants below, are defendants in error., Plaintiff in error filed her petition in the district court of Delaware county, Okla., to quiet her title to certain lands in said county, to which she had obtained a tax deed. She attempted to obtain service upon the defendants in error by publication and obtained a default judgment against them. Defendants in error thereafter filed their petition in said cause to vacate said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Trower v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Duncan v. McAlester-choctaw Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Linderman v. NolanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  5. Griffin v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Haskell v. CutlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Welborn v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. A. & A. Taxicab Co. v. McCainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API