Legal Opinion

Yuen Shing Lee v. Ashcroft

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 22, 2003No. 01 CV 0997 SJPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This Court previously granted Petitioner Yuen Shing Lee’s (“Petitioner”) pro se application for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“ § 2241”), by Memorandum and Order dated July 15, 2001. Respondents John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service thereafter filed a Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment pursuant to Rule 59(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 59(3)”). Respondents, noting that “[t]he July 15 Decision has ramifications extending far beyond this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
Leszek Hughes, A.K.A. Thomas Lloyd Hughes, A.K.A. Tom v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
Westmoreland Capital Corporation, Joseph M. Jayson and Judith P. Jayson v. George D. Findlay and John F. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
Luya Liu v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
Dung Van Chau v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Lee v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005