Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co. v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
COX E, District Judge.
This is a suit for the infringement of letters patent No. 527,301, granted to Hubert Claus for improvements in enameling- metal ware, granted October 9, 1894. On the 16th of November, 1894, Claus duly assigned the patent to the complainant and the Bt. Louis Stamping Company. On the 31st of January, 1899, the Bt. Louis Company duly assigned its half interest in the patent to the Haberman Manufacturing Company, Kieck-heffer Bros., and Matthai, Ingram & Co., who in turn assigned it to the defendant. The legal title to the patent is, therefore, in the complainant and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aspinwall, Manuf'g Co. v. GillUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
- Blackledge v. Weir & Craig Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
- De Witt v. . Elmira Nobles Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Clum v. BrewerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1855
- Dunham v. Indianapolis & St. L. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bendix Aviation Corporation v. KuryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1950
- Klein v. BeachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Rainbow Rubber Co. v. Holtite Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937
- Davis v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.