Legal Opinion
Rainbow Rubber Co. v. Holtite Mfg. Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 26, 1937No. 2509PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
The question presented for decision arises upon a motion of the defendant, the Holtite Manufacturing Company, a Maryland corporation, to dismiss a bill of complaint in a patent infringement suit brought by the Rainbow Rubber Company, a Penn sylvania corporation. The ground for the motion is that the Rainbow Rubber Company has joined the Auburn Rubber Corporation, a Delaware corporation, as a party plaintiff without its consent, as is alleged in the bill of complaint; that by various assignments the Rainbow Company and the Auburn Rubber Corporation are each…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schering Corporation v. Roussel-Uclaf Sa, Involuntary v. Zeneca Inc. And Zeneca Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. James P. Byrne, D.B.A. Byrne Wallpaper & Paint StoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Catanzaro v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Bendix Aviation Corporation v. KuryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1950
- American Optical Co. v. CurtissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.