Legal Opinion
Bertrand v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 1, 1983No. Civ. 81-838-RE, 81-1049-REPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REDDEN, District Judge:
The plaintiffs in these cases are the owners of retail food stores who successfully challenged the actions of the federal Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), which sought to disqualify the stores from participating in the federal food stamp redemption program. See Bertrand and Devore v. United States, 552 F.Supp. 878 (D.Or.1982). The plaintiffs now seek attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. I am guided by Rico-Sorio v. INS, 552 F.Supp. 965 (D.Or.1982) (Judge Burns), and Southern Oregon Citizens Against Toxic Sprays v. Watt,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Labor Relations Board v. Doral Building Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Southern Oregon Citizens Against Toxic Sprays v. WattDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983
- Rico-Sorio v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1982
- Bertrand v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Franklin v. State of Or.District Court, D. Oregon · 1983
- Bayless v. Irv Leopold Imports, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1987
- Thornton v. BowenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Rawlings v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Rawlings v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984