Southern Oregon Citizens Against Toxic Sprays v. Watt
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FRYE, Judge:
This matter is before the court upon plaintiff’s request for $15,375 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA).
Plaintiff prevailed in its effort to obtain an injunction against further herbicide spraying in the Medford District. It prevailed on its fourth argument, which was that defendants were required to include a “worst case analysis” in the Environmental Assessment, disclosing and evaluating scientific uncertainty concerning the human health effects of certain of the herbicides in use. The court enjoined all herbicide…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Lawyers Guild v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Sierra Club v. SiglerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southern Oregon Citizens Against Toxic Sprays, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State of Louisiana, Ex Rel. William J. Guste, Jr., and Save Our Coast, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Colonel Robert C. Lee, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Bertrand v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983
- Freddie Butts v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2016
- United States v. 27.09 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in HarrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.