Rawlings v. Heckler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
JAMES M. BURNS, Chief Judge,
Sitting by Designation, specially concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I concur, in the main, in Judge Tang’s opinion as indicated herein. I write separately to call attention to the problems created by the increasing time spent litigating attorney’s fee issues. I see it increasingly in my ordinary work, i.e., on the trial court. Indeed, I recently indulged in an inelegant figure of speech in a case before me, Stanwood v. Green, 559 F.Supp. 196 at 202 (D.Or.1983) in which it seemed as if attorneys spent almost as much time litigating the attorney’s fee issue…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. LOPEZ Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lopez v. HecklerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Leschniok v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.