Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Doral Building Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1982No. 81-7206PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Upon due consideration of Doral’s application for fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act and the National Labor Relations Board’s opposition thereto, the court concludes that since Doral has not prevailed on the merits of the underlying action, 9th Cir., 666 F.2d 432, an award of fees at this time would be inappropriate. See Hanrahan v. Hampton, 446 U.S. 754, 100 S.Ct. 1987, 64 L.Ed.2d 670 (1979). Although Hanrahan involved the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988, we cannot distinguish it from the Equal Access to Justice Act for purposes of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Labor Relations Board v. Doral Building Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by23 opinions
- J.H. McQuiston v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, United States Army Missile CommandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jose Rolando Escobar Ruiz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Morris v. Brewer v. American Battle Monuments CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Corine Proctor v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lauritzen v. Secretary of the NavyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.