Legal Opinion
In Re the Grand Jury Appearance Request by Loigman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 11, 2005PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALBIN, Justice.
In this case, Larry S. Loigman, a Monmouth County lawyer, professes to have information bearing on the legality of a state-run program intended to deter underage drinking. He has not reported any allegation of criminal wrongdoing to a state or federal law enforcement agency in New Jersey. Instead, he argues that he has a common law right to present his claims directly to a grand jury for investigation. The Monmouth County Assignment Judge denied Loigman’s application for direct access to the grand jury. The Appellate Division ruled in Loigman’s favor, holding that a citizen has…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- State v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State v. TriestmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- State v. Gary Lunsford (075691)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- State v. SimonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- State v. BradleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.