Legal Opinion

State v. Gary Lunsford (075691)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 1, 2016No. A-61-14PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner

For more than three decades, this Court has departed from federal law and recognized that, under the New Jersey Constitution, individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in information they provide to phone companies, banks, and Internet service providers in order to use commercial services. The Court has consistently applied that principle to protect personal information from unrestricted government access. No party in this appeal seeks to disturb that precept, which is a bedrock feature of New Jersey law.

As a general rule, the greater the degree of intrusion into one’s private…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. TutisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  2. Facebook, Inc. v. State of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2023
  3. New Jersey Republican State Committee v. Philip D. Murphy (084731)(Mercer County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020
  4. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANDREW F. STOVEKEN STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. GEORGE BEECHER (16-08-0130, 16-08-0129, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  5. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARQUIS ARMSTRONG (15-05-0932, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API