Legal Opinion

State v. Frost

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 15, 1999PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

COLEMAN, J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether certain prosecutorial comments made during the closing-argument phase of defendants’ criminal trial deprived them of a fair trial. The Appellate Division in an unpublished opinion concluded that the prosecutor’s comments were inappropriate, but harmless. We granted defendant Albert Frost’s petition for certification. 153 N.J. 217, 708 A.2d 68 (1998). We now grant defendant Barry Frost’s late petition for certification and reverse both defendants’ convictions.

I

On November 16, 1995, cousins Albert…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. State v. ReddishSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  3. State v. R.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API