Legal Opinion

City of Columbia v. Assa'ad-Faltas

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 21, 2017No. Appellate Case No. 2015-000941; Opinion No. 27723PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this direct appeal, Appellant Marie-Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals her simple assault conviction and sentence, arguing her right to self-representation was violated and that she is entitled to a new trial in which she represents herself. For many years, Appellant has engaged in a pattern of frivolous filings and inappropriate conduct towards the courts, court officers, and court employees of this State. Appellant’s abuse of the justice system has even reached the United States Supreme Court. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Richland Cnty. *32Sheriffs Dept., — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1418, 191 L.Ed.2d 354…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Cochran v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Maurice Trimaine SingletonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API