City of Columbia v. Assa'ad-Faltas
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this direct appeal, Appellant Marie-Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals her simple assault conviction and sentence, arguing her right to self-representation was violated and that she is entitled to a new trial in which she represents herself. For many years, Appellant has engaged in a pattern of frivolous filings and inappropriate conduct towards the courts, court officers, and court employees of this State. Appellant’s abuse of the justice system has even reached the United States Supreme Court. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Richland Cnty. *32Sheriffs Dept., — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1418, 191 L.Ed.2d 354…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cochran v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Maurice Trimaine SingletonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026