Legal Opinion

Creekside Apartments v. Poteat

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 1994No. 9315DC894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

In this case, plaintiff initiated proceedings to evict defendants from plaintiff’s apartments because defendants had not paid their rent. Defendants alleged the premises were unfit and counterclaimed for rent abatement, breach of the implied warranty of habitability, and damages under the unfair practices statutes. The trial court found the premises unfit and ordered partial abatement of rent owed by defendants. The trial court denied defendants’ counterclaims for breach of the implied warranty of habitability and for unfair trade practices. We find the trial court erred in not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Canady v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shadow Group, LLC v. Heather Hills Home Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Dean v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Friday v. United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Pierce v. ReichardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Von Pettis Realty, Inc. v. McKoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API