Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Reichard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 2004No. COA02-1749PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Judge.

Plaintiff Ricky Pierce (“Pierce”) owns a house located at 107 Beech Street, Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina. On 5 April 1999, defendant Tammy Reichard (“Ms. Reichard”) signed a lease in which she agreed to rent the house from Pierce for $300 per month, plus a $300 security deposit. Approximately two weeks after Ms. Reichard moved into the house, the roof over the living room began to leak after a heavy rainfall. Ms. Reichard and her husband immediately taped up the ceiling to try to stop the leaking. After a period of disputing over the leaks and other matters, Pierce filed a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Brewington v. LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. S.N.R. Management Corp. v. Danube Partners 141, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Richardson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Dean v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. In re Will of McFaydenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Weiler v. HooshiariSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API