Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. Turney

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1919No. Civ. No. 2030PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The action was brought to recover a broker’s commission of five hundred dollars for the exchange of real properties. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for that amount, defendant appeals.

Defendant and his wife were the owners, as tenants in common, of two lots, consisting of forty acres, in Fairmead Colony No. 3, in the county of Madera. About one year before the contract in suit was executed, defendant signed a “listing card,” in which he authorized plaintiff to sell or trade his real and personal property (describing it) for the sum of ten thousand dollars, stating that he would trade…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Justice v. . LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Vassault v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Rice v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API