Legal Opinion
Maloy v. Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 15, 1995No. 94-9238PublishedCited by 35 opinions
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Mark E. Maloy (“Maloy”) appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his action filed under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. Specifically, Maloy challenges the district court’s finding that the alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(ll) occurred on the date the debt collection letter in question was mailed, thereby barring Maloy’s action as filed outside the applicable one-year statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.
I
The relevant facts in this case are undisputed. The defendant/appellee, Arthur L. Phillips and Phillips, Davis & Donner, a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phillip E. Bates, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Defendant v. C & S Adjusters, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Nelda Mattson v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., Service Investment Corporation, Doing Business as Service Investment Collection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Violet M. Maahs, and Alfred J. Maahs, Her Husband v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
3Cited by35 opinions
- Curtis Bartlett v. John A. Heibl and John A. Heibl, Attorney at LawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Kaplan v. Assetcare, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
- Fontell v. HassettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.