Ledermann v. Pennsylvania Railroad
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The defendant, Western Maryland Railway Company, appearing specially, moves to dismiss this action as to it on two grounds: first, it is not doing business in the State of New York and so is not amenable to process here; second, that the maintenance of the action here constitutes an undue burden on it in its capacity of carrier in interstate commerce.
The action was brought by a resident of New York against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company and the Western Maryland. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff in Pennsylvania delivered certain machinery and equipment to Western Maryland for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- International Milling Co. v. Columbia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. TerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farber v. Zenith Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991