Legal Opinion
International Milling Co. v. Columbia Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 28, 1934No. 561PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
Petitioner, plaintiff in the court below, is a Delaware corporation, a dealer in grain, with its principal office and place of business in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Respondent, defendant below, is also a Delaware corporation, a carrier by water, with its principal office in Cleveland, Ohio. We are to determine whether in the circumstances exhibited in the record a suit between the parties in the courts of Minnesota is an unreasonable burden upon interstate commerce.
On January 1, 1930, petitioner loaded a cargo of grain on one of the vessels of respondent’s predecessor for transportation and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. TerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frederick T. Ray v. C.O. Kertes C.O. Stolz C.O. Reed C.O. Rogers Lt. Nash Lt. Hicks Lt. A. Smith Capt. Almanshifer R. Norris Tim Launtz, Frederick RayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.