Legal Opinion

People v. Meralla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Based on the record, we find that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel at his second trial, particularly as to his severance and collateral estoppel claims, the latter which, though not properly preserved (see, People v Padro, 75 NY2d 820), we review in the interest of justice.

The evidence offered against defendant in the second trial, where it was alleged that he and a co-defendant murdered Ezra Garbutt and that the co-defendant alone murdered Mary Caroline, Garbutt’s girlfriend, was essentially the same as that upon which he was acquitted at the first trial, where he alone…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. People v. MahboubianNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. PadroNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meralla v. GoldenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Meralla v. GoldenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. FerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API